Comparison Filed Oct 12, 2026 by Erika & Joe

Ricoh GR IIIx vs Canon G7 X Mark III: which pocket camera to buy

Checked on . Erika & Joe.

Our verdict

Buy the Ricoh GR IIIx if you mostly take still photos and want top image quality in a jeans pocket: APS-C, 40 mm-equivalent f/2.8, 262 g, $1,249.95 [1]. Buy the Canon G7 X Mark III for video, selfies or zoom: 24–100 mm, a 180° flip screen, 4K and a mic jack, from $879.99, out of stock [2]. It has an APS-C sensor, much larger than the 1-inch sensors in zoom compacts, a fixed 40 mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens, and weighs 262 g, for $1,249.95 [1]. Buy the Canon G7 X Mark III if you shoot video, selfies or need zoom. It has a 24–100 mm-equivalent f/1.8–2.8 lens, a screen that flips 180°, 4K 30p video and a mic jack [2]. Canon's store lists it from $879.99 but out of stock [2].

The short answer

The Ricoh GR IIIx is the better stills camera: a 24 MP APS-C sensor, sensor-shift stabilization and a fixed 40 mm-equivalent lens in a 262 g body, for $1,249.95 [1]. The Canon G7 X Mark III is the better video and all-round travel camera: a 20.1 MP 1-inch sensor, a 4.2x zoom, a 180° flip screen, 4K 30p and a 3.5 mm mic input, listed from $879.99 [2]. Checked on the makers' US sites on 2026-10-16.

Ricoh GR IIIx

Ricoh GR IIIx

Ricoh
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Canon

Side by side (makers' pages, checked 2026-10-16)

SpecRicoh GR IIIxCanon G7 X Mark III
Price$1,249.95 [1]"As low as $879.99," out of stock [2]
SensorAPS-C, about 24.24 MP, no AA filter [1]1.0-inch stacked CMOS, 20.1 MP [2]
Lens26.1 mm (about 40 mm equiv.) f/2.8, fixed [1]24–100 mm equiv. f/1.8–2.8, 4.2x optical zoom [2]
Crop modes / zoom50 mm and 71 mm crops [1]4x digital zoom on top of optical [2]
Stabilization3-axis sensor shift, up to 4 stops [1]Optical IS [2]
Closest focus12 cm in macro mode [1]5 cm at the wide end [2]
Screen3.0 in fixed touch LCD [1]3.0 in touch LCD, tilts 180° [2]
ViewfinderNone; optional GV-3 external finder [1]None [2]
VideoFull HD up to 60p [1]4K 29.97p, Full HD up to 119.88p [2]
Mic inputNot in our source3.5 mm [2]
Live streamingNoYes, to YouTube [2]
Built-in flashNot in our sourceYes [2]
Battery (CIPA)About 200 shots [1]About 235 shots, 320 in ECO mode [2]
ChargingUSB-C [1]USB-C in-camera charging, about 110 min with Canon's PD-E1 adapter [2]
Weight262 g with battery and card [1]304 g with battery and card [2]
Size109.4 x 61.9 x 35.2 mm [1]105.0 x 60.9 x 41.4 mm [2]
Operating tempNot in our source0–40°C [2]

Full cost

Cost itemGR IIIxG7 X Mark III
Camera$1,249.95 [1]From $879.99, out of stock [2]
Spare batteryAbout 200 shots per charge [1]About 235 shots [2]
Viewfinder—None available [2]
ChargerUSB-C in camera [1]USB-C; Canon's PD-E1 adapter mentioned [2]
SubscriptionNoneNone

The real difference: sensor or zoom

Image quality. The Ricoh's APS-C sensor is physically much larger than the Canon's 1-inch sensor [1][2]. In practice, that means cleaner low-light pictures and more natural background blur at the same framing. Ricoh owners say the pictures look good straight out of a pocket camera [3]. A Canon owner who hikes and mountain-bikes with a Mark III says focus and low light are worse than their Canon RP full-frame camera [4], which is the trade any 1-inch compact makes.

Lens. The Ricoh has one focal length, 40 mm equivalent, with crop modes to 50 and 71 mm [1]. You zoom with your feet. The Canon zooms from 24 to 100 mm [2]. For landscapes that need wide, or a distant ridgeline, the Canon is more flexible. Its f/1.8 wide end is also brighter than the Ricoh's f/2.8 [1][2].

Video and vlogging. No contest. The Canon records 4K at 29.97 fps, Full HD up to 119.88 fps, has a 3.5 mm mic jack, flips its screen 180° for selfies and can live-stream to YouTube [2]. The Ricoh records Full HD up to 60p and has a fixed screen [1].

Size. The Ricoh is thinner, 35.2 mm against 41.4 mm, and lighter, 262 g against 304 g [1][2]. Both fit a jacket pocket. The Ricoh is the one owners describe shooting one-handed [3][5].

Reliability complaints. Both have lens covers that owners say can stick. Ricoh owners report a lens window that won't open fully [6]. A Canon owner found the lens shutters wouldn't open fully after five days [7]. Another Canon owner says the Mark III lens has autofocus issues that firmware never fixed [8]. A four-year Ricoh owner calls it the most fragile camera they've owned [5].

Battery. Both are short. Ricoh rates about 200 shots and Canon about 235, or 320 in ECO mode [1][2]. Carry spares for either.

Pick the Ricoh GR IIIx if

  • Still photos are the point, and you want the biggest sensor in a pocket body [1].
  • You like a fixed 40 mm view for street, travel and people [1].
  • Thin and light matters, at 262 g [1].
  • You want macro to 12 cm [1].

Pick the Canon G7 X Mark III if

  • You shoot video, vlog or want selfies with a flip screen [2].
  • You need zoom, from 24 to 100 mm [2].
  • You want a mic jack or live streaming [2].
  • You'd rather spend about $880 than $1,250, if you can find one in stock [1][2].

Or consider

If you want more zoom than either, the Sony RX100 VII reaches 200 mm equivalent for $1,499.99 [9]. See Sony RX100 VII vs Canon G7 X Mark III and our pocket travel cameras roundup.

In the desert

Dust. Both lenses retract behind small covers, and owners of both report covers that stick [6][7]. Keep the camera in a zip bag on dirt roads. Ricoh adds ultrasonic sensor cleaning [1], which shakes dust off the sensor but can't clean the lens cover.

Heat. Canon rates the G7 X Mark III from 0 to 40°C [2]. Ricoh says the GR IIIx stops video automatically if it gets too hot inside [1]. A car in desert sun gets hotter than either is built for. Keep it in a cooler bag or in the cab.

Glare. Neither has a built-in viewfinder [1][2]. Screens are hard to read in midday sun. Ricoh sells an optional GV-3 external optical finder [1]. With the Canon, tilting the screen away from the sun helps.

Night sky. The Canon has Star Nightscape, Star Trails and Star Time-Lapse modes [2]. The Ricoh's larger sensor gathers more light per shot [1]. Both need a small tripod.

Charging. Both charge over USB-C [1][2], so a power bank at camp works.

What owners say

Ricoh GR IIIx

  • After three weeks, an owner kept it because it shoots well one-handed and the pictures look good [3].
  • After four years and about 50,000 shots, an owner calls it ideal one-handed and the most fragile camera they've owned [5].

Canon G7 X Mark III

  • An owner of both the Mark II and Mark III says the Mark III lens has autofocus issues that firmware never solved [8].
  • After five days, an owner found the lens shutters wouldn't open fully [7].

Questions people ask

Is the Ricoh GR IIIx better than the Canon G7 X Mark III?

For still photos, yes, because of its larger APS-C sensor [1]. For video, zoom and vlogging, the Canon is better [2].

Which is better for vlogging?

The Canon, with its 180° flip screen, 4K and mic jack [2].

Does the Ricoh GR IIIx zoom?

No. It has a fixed 40 mm-equivalent lens with 50 and 71 mm crop modes [1].

Which has better battery life?

The Canon, slightly: about 235 shots, or 320 in ECO mode, against about 200 [1][2].

Is the Canon G7 X Mark III discontinued?

Canon's US store lists it "as low as $879.99" but out of stock as of 2026-10-16 [2]. It doesn't say discontinued.

Where to buy

Ricoh GR IIIx:

Canon G7 X Mark III:

Full pages:

Ricoh GR IIIx · Canon G7 X Mark III

— Erika & Joe

Sources

Checked 2026-10-16.

  1. Ricoh Imaging, GR IIIx (specs and price)
  2. Canon USA, PowerShot G7 X Mark III (shop page and specs)
  3. r/ricohGR, the good, the bad, the ugly
  4. r/canon, G7 X for hiking
  5. r/ricohGR, four years
  6. r/ricohGR, best and worst
  7. r/canon, lens covers
  8. r/Cameras, worth buying a G7X
  9. Sony, RX100 VII